UPDATE[edit source]

I think this page needs heavy rewriting - or moving to an archive. So a new page can be created with the current CHDK build alone (and a link to SDM, so that isnt a must).

--PhyrePhoX 08:29, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

READ THIS: Please limit talk on this page discussion on how this firmware should be compared. Go to the forums if you have questions.

Topics on this talk page[edit source]

Please keep this talk page on topic. There's a forum (link on your left) if you want to discuss "why doesn't this work" or other similar. Mc hamster 04:33, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposition of few changes and extensions:[edit source]

  • Split this page to "Camera suport" and "CHDK builds history"?
  • I will try to extend "CHDK_Change" template for easier aditions:
    • Change style depend on change kind:
      • + addition
      • - delete
      • * patch(correction)
      • other styles?
    • author of change
    • other?
  • other?

Any other propositions or objections? G2mk 21:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC) <br\> Corrections, contributions, comments and help are welcome... Hope that you don't get recent changes as vandalism? G2mk 21:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: History ... I've renamed it from History to Overview. An overview is useful to gather comparison data, but history is not. Mc hamster 04:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Page move[edit source]

I'm not native English speaker, and my knowledge of English grammar is weak, so... Shouldn't this page be renamed to "Firmware Comparison"?G2mk 12:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

When I started this page, the original intent was to have multiple matrices which would then fulfill the plural 'comparisons'. In fact, if you look into the page history there were place holders for other methods of comparison. It's my hope that this will still happen. Mc hamster 04:12, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Grey...[edit source]

...could also mean: Doesn't know much about all this, thinks of buying a camera, but only if it is running with the chdk (intervalometer needed). Doesn't know how complicated it is to check if a build fpr the 570 also runs on the 590 (just try to run it?). Thank you. -- 21:37, 13 April 2008 (EDT)

Please correct...[edit source]

May I embrace native speakers and people with good English knowledge to correct my edits? --G2mk 19:43, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Your edits look awesome. I'll grammar check. Mc hamster 04:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

SD750 removed from table again[edit source]

The SD750 was missing from this table. I inquired as to why it was missing and a very helpful person added the SD750 files to the table. Now it appears to be gone again. Not sure why, as I can find no record of its deletion.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.